Forum Topic

Hopefully a decrease in the amount of consultation required doesn't lead to a corresponding increase in the amount of bad ideas that get implemented. Can you explain what the net benefit of closing Fishers Lane to cars would be? As far as I can see it would divert the flow of traffic on roads where more people live than it takes currently. The 94 can get significantly delayed if there is a lot of traffic on South Parade and around Bedford Corner so there would be a negative effect on public transport. We know that traffic will build up here if you close Fishers Lane because everytime this it has been closed due to flooding or bridge works this is exactly what has happened. If TGT was closed at the same time the traffic build up would be even greater than it has been in the past. What possible reason would Ealing Council have for agreeing to a measure that would generate more traffic on residential streets in its borough and reduce the reliability of a key bus route? Nobody would seem to benefit from the measure — as a cyclist it would make my journeys more difficult due to the congestion on South Parade. It would do nothing to solve the most important issue by far, the difficulty for cyclists of crossing CHR at this point. If anything it might make it slightly more difficult. The notion that new regulations might allow people to plan fantasy traffic engineer because the removal of consultation requirements means there will be no piffling objections from people who live in the areas affected or use the routes might be an exciting one to you but more caution is needed. Borough transport staff have been looking at ways that they can restrict vehicle access to local residential roads as much as they can for decades and all the easy wins have already been made. Unfettered reducing of access may feel like a win for the good guys but if it just redirects traffic to make a different group of people more miserable nothing is being achieved.

Kevin Howard ● 2348d

Can we stop lumping cycling and walking together as if they are not mutually antagonistic. You might feel safer as a cyclist but it is certainly not safer for pedestrians with or without the effects of SARS-COV-2.We have certainly been given the lie that cyclists are somehow excused for breaking the law and riding on the pavement because they are too scared to ride in the road.So far, I have not yet been knocked right over by pavement cyclists but even in the very sort walks that I have been undertaking recently, I am forced to jump out of the way to avoid being hit by the speeding cyclists ignoring the empty road beside the pavement on which they are riding. This occurred three times Friday within 5 minutes on Turnham Green Terrace and the High Road.6ft distance? - not even 6 inches. We cannot even enjoy parks in peace and quiet. Cyclists speed along the lime avenue in Chiswick House but there is no reason for them to be racing through anyway and the 5 mph speed limit applies to them too, bicycles having been designated in English law as road vehicles since 1879. They also ignore the signs restricting cycling to the perimeter.Where are the local politicians supporting policing this anti-social behaviour. Oh wait a minute, our MP is not exactly unbiased in this matter so no hope is there.Just the Dominic Cummings excuse that so many cyclists consider themselves to be above the law and above morals.There is nothing positive about not feeling safe walking in the park or along the road or even crossing on a green light. Nothing positive about no longer being able to walk along Corney Reach and enjoy the river where there were, at last count 27 no cycling signs being ignored. At least Dominic Cummings claimed that he was "testing his eyesight"; the apparently blind cyclists clearly don't bother.I will be more than happy to thank local politicians when they stop being like Boris Johnson and start enforcing the law for all our sakes.

Charlotte Kasner ● 2347d

Vehicles travelling the length of Dukes Avenue will fall into two groups, firstly local people who know the area and are taking the most direct route to their home and secondly drivers using Sat Navs like Waze who are being directed there. Restricting access to Dukes Avenue to the former group will probably be self-defeating because they will just use alternative routes like Sutton Court Road and Heathfield Gardens which are equally problematic. However it would only need a tweak to the algorithm of Sat Navs to guide more drivers away from local residential streets.For instance eastbound traffic on the A4 should be encouraged to get to their destination via Chiswick High Road.  The problems at Wellesley Road and Stile Hall Gardens intensified due to the use of Sat Navs and our money is being spent sorting out the resulting problem. If local government had greater powers to act when Sat Navs were causing local traffic issues problems like this could be sorted without any expense. On TGT, the fact that E3s will continue to trundle up and down it will mean that it will still be far from properly pedestrianised. This is an important orbital bus route which many key workers will currently be relying so redirecting it at the moment isn't really an option. However, bear in mind that the health centre is going to be demolished and the replacement will be at Stamford Brook. Diverting the E3 along Bath Road and Goldhawk Road would give much better public transport access to the new health centre and allow a proper pedestrianisation of TGT. 

Andrew OSullivan ● 2345d

Vehicles travelling the length of Dukes Avenue will fall into two groups, firstly local people who know the area and are taking the most direct route to their home and secondly drivers using Sat Navs like Waze who are being directed there. Restricting access to Dukes Avenue to the former group will probably be self-defeating because they will just use alternative routes like Sutton Court Road and Heathfield Gardens which are equally problematic. However it would only need a tweak to the algorithm of Sat Navs to guide more drivers away from local residential streets.For instance eastbound traffic on the A4 should be encouraged to get to their destination via Chiswick High Road.  The problems at Wellesley Road and Stile Hall Gardens intensified due to the use of Sat Navs and our money is being spent sorting out the resulting problem. If local government had greater powers to act when Sat Navs were causing local traffic issues problems like this could be sorted without any expense. On TGT, the fact that E3s will continue to trundle up and down it will mean that it will still be far from properly pedestrianised. This is an important orbital bus route which many key workers will currently be relying so redirecting it at the moment isn't really an option. However, bear in mind that the health centre is going to be demolished and the replacement will be at Stamford Brook. Diverting the E3 along Bath Road and Goldhawk Road would give much better public transport access to the new health centre and allow a proper pedestrianisation of TGT. 

Andrew OSullivan ● 2345d