Oh god, here he goes again, constructing an entire narrative based upon nothing more than speculation. A “piece together”, a “rough approximation”, a “clearly” which isn’t clear, an “even if”, a “if we assume”...Paul, this is looks like nothing more than wishful thinking on your part. You don’t want the Cycleway so you then work backwards inventing theories to support this.If you hadn’t noticed, TfL hasn’t restarted work on ANY construction projects other than those deemed safety critical.Temporary barriers have already gone in along the Cycleway 9 route on Hammersmith Rd. Remember, this is something that you proclaimed two weeks ago wouldn’t happen because they wouldn’t reduce road width and they needed traffic orders. Guess what, they reduced road width and they didn’t need traffic orders.As to your claims that safety benefits are “highly debatable”, let’s see your analysis of cyclist casualties and the impact of cycleway 9.
Michael Robinson ● 2356d