Forum Topic

I am no more or less "obsessed" than anyone else who posts occasionally on some of the hundreds of threads on this forum.And as for your visit to Auschwitz (v.interesting btw), I've not been there myself, but I don't see it as a "competition" to prove my credentials - I am content with my own experiences and education on the matter, including having been to relevant sites in a number of European countries including Poland and Germany (plus Israel).Now to Michael Brown. Were he just a simple fool, who genuinely cannot understand straighforward facts or concepts, then he wouldn't matter. Rather, he is the one who is "obsessed", to the extent that he is totally impervious to reason. (Which incidentally is why I no longer address his rantings these days.)Which, other than the distress he must cause to those whose genuine suffering he scorns and dismisses, shouldn't greatly matter greatly either.But the real problem is that some uneducated, gullible or vulnerable people may get sucked down the rabbit hole which he has dug for himself and eventually, by stages, it leads to other people eg destroying 5G masts outside hospitals.Which is why I call him out over The Holocaust. For if he denies a genuinely monstrous and incontrovertible conspiracy like that, then what does it say for the credibility of all his other "theories"?Quite simply, it exposes him for all to see, which in turn explains why he refuses to come clean on it.As for you, you may accept or reject his nonsense as you wish. Either way, I shall carry on posting as and when I choose.

Richard Cathcart ● 2387d