Thanks. David Icke would appear to be controlled opposition, which can operate in various ways. In Icke’s case, the game seems to be to channel truth through him to bring ridicule to the truth; but that’s not to say he couldn’t also provide a false narrative of a given event to mislead his followers, or completely pull the rug from under them, so care always needs to be taken. However, I’ve carried out enough of my own research into different events to know that he, generally, provides accurate accounts. Being a figure of ridicule seems to be deemed sufficient to safely channel truth through him for the reasons given. He seems to skip certain events too, perhaps those that are considered too sensitive to publicise by him and ‘the team’.
Michael Brown ● 2401d