Blunder Delays Dominos Licensing Decision
Councillor sat on committee of which he wasn't a member
Left: Cllr Ranjit Gill. Right: Dominos Pizza.
August 8, 2025
A “misunderstanding” which saw a councillor vote on the licensing application from Dominos on Chiswick High Road even though he wasn’t entitled to has led to a delay in the decision.
The blunder by Cllr Ranjit Gill and Hounslow Council officers is set to cost the borough hundreds of pounds because the meeting needs to be held again in the coming weeks. This has caused frustration to the significant number of residents, particularly living on Cranbrook Road, who were seeking to block the licence extension.
Cllr Gill attended a Hounslow Licensing Panel on 15 July, and voted on the outcome with the committee deciding to refuse the application. In order to sit as a member of the Licensing Panel, councillors first have to be appointed by the council to sit as members of the Licensing and General Purposes Committee. Most appointments were made at a council meeting on 27 May but Cllr Gill was not among them.
Following that meeting, Hounslow Council said there was a need for further changes to the appointments, but that Cllr Gill was “to be nominated” to sit as a member of the committee. Cllr Gill, in anticipation of his appointment, undertook licensing training. The Chiswick Gunnersbury councillor had recently defected from the Conservative group to join the Labour party.
A spokesperson for the council said that due to a “misunderstanding” during the arrangement for the Licensing Panel meeting, council officers believed that Cllr Gill had already been appointed, and he was included in the meeting as if he was a member of the panel – which he wasn’t.
A council spokesperson said, “The costs of meeting rooms and staff are part of the council’s general overheads. That is, there is no additional charge in relation to operational or staff costs for holding Licensing Panel (or other committee) meetings.
“The only additional cost is for legal support. The legal costs incurred have yet to be billed to the council by our legal advisors therefore we cannot confirm an exact cost but we would expect the charges to be in the region of between £250 to £500.”
At a meeting of the full council on 22 July, Conservative Cllr Jack Emsley, raised a point of order concerning Cllr Gill’s attendance at the Licensing Panel, labelling it a “breach of the constitution”.
Benita Edwards, Director of Law and Governance, apologised for the misunderstanding, and confirmed this was a breach, and that the decision is null and void.
She added, “I have looked into it, and there was an officer there. So, officers mistakenly assumed that Cllr Gill had actually been appointed to the Licensing and General Purposes Committee.”
She continued: “I have concluded that the meeting last week of the Licensing Panel wasn’t properly convened; it is as if the meeting never took place, and any decisions or determinations that the Licensing Panel would have undertaken last week were effectively null and void. Having reached that view, the effect of that is the application remains with the licensing authority to determine.”
After the meeting, Cllr Emsley told the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS), “This licensing application is an important issue for my constituents, many of whom wrote to me urging the council to make a swift decision. Residents in Chiswick will rightly feel frustrated not only that Cllr Gill’s actions jeopardised the decision taken by the panel and caused an unnecessary delay in this process, but that taxpayer money will now be wasted in having to reconvene the meeting.
“I hope that the panel is now able to quickly meet again and end this saga, and that the Labour Group takes appropriate action to ensure its councillors do not jeopardise future licensing issues in Chiswick.”
Philip James Lynch - Local Democracy Reporter
Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism. Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets. We've always done that and won't be changing, in fact we'd like to do more. However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do. We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area. A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact info@neighbournet.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site. One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute. If you do support us in this way we'd be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor. For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you'd like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site. |